My Photo
Blog powered by Typepad

December 2018

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

« The Old Red Hat: Philadelphia Phillies victory song | Main | ‘I’m Joe the Slugger’ »

October 27, 2008

Comments

jj mollo

Eason Jordon? I agree with this statement of course, but I think he is more responsible than anyone that these stories did not get wide distribution. When he could have been reporting Saddam's atrocities, he was currying favor with the regime in order to retain his "access". When Saddam was gone, no one was interested, least of all Eason Jordan. He should be "haunted" by these stories, and by his own role in suppressing them.

Frank Warner

Yep, but once Iraq was liberated, instead of asking Iraqis to reveal the horrors of Saddam's totalitarianism, the press decided instead decided to reveal the horrors of liberation.

Days after this honest Eason Jordan piece, the press was telling us that the Iraq National Museum had been totally looted as U.S. troops stood by doing nothing. Never mind that no more than 3 percent of the museum's contents were looted (and probably only 1 percent); the story now was that the evil occupiers had ruined everything.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)