My Photo
Blog powered by Typepad

December 2018

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

« Big brave Harry Reid calls Gen. Peter Pace ‘incompetent’ | Main | Oh, no, Kyoto! Europe increases CO2 emissions! »

June 14, 2007

Comments

Allen

You're preaching to the choir with this one. The long term trend over dadeces is global warming. During that long term there will be lots of hot and cold fluctuations both above and below that global warming trend. When I hear the argument that you did I want to give the person a stupid slap. One comedian might say, Here's your sign. Some clearly don't understand. The others are either in denial or willing to risk it all for a bit more of what they consider the good life with the minor result of global warming. We're losing the ice at the poles. No cold snap will help that. How to turn that attitude around? I have no idea.

George

Depending what "long term" you select, the trend can be either way. The earth is not at its warmest point in time. It's been warmer before so why wouldn't we expect it to get warm again?

The global warming forecasts have been proven again and again to poorly predict future temperatures and sea levels. How do you maintain any faith in these forecasters?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)