The Freedom Count tallies the number of times a speaker, usually a U.S. president, mentions “freedom,” “liberty” and “democracy” in an important speech. The premise is that if a speaker cares about something, he will mention it.
Over the years, we’ve come to see that a Freedom Count under 5 is low, and a Freedom Count of 10 or higher is high. (President Bush's second inaugural address set the record, with a Freedom Count of 43.)
In President Obama’s speech yesterday on the planned use of military force, not including ground troops, to support Libyan opponents of dictator Moammar Qaddafi, the president registered a Freedom Count of zero.
Which is stunning, considering all the opportunities to accidentally refer to Qaddafi’s opponents as freedom-fighters, or people fighting for their freedom or pro-democracy forces. It didn’t happen; no freedom, no liberty, no democracy in this speech.
Freedom Count
Freedom: 0
Liberty: 0
Democracy: 0
Total: 0
Derivative trading. To be fair, Obama did say:
“Left unchecked, we have every reason to believe that Qaddafi would commit atrocities against his people. … The democratic values that we stand for would be overrun.”
But since the Freedom Count has never counted derivative words such as “democratic,” it can’t be counted now if the count is to consistently count. Besides, the point of the Freedom Count is to measure what specifically a speaker is for. What are democratic values? Spell it out. You might hit a match in this pinball game.
It was encouraging, however, to hear the president again use the term “universal values,” which usually ticks off the Chinese dictatorship.
“We have made clear our support for a set of universal values, and our support for the political and economic change that the people of the region deserve.”
So OK, Obama gets subliminal points for that one.
‘Our cause is just.’ But his summary was weak:
“Our goal is focused, our cause is just, and our coalition is strong. Thank you very much.”
Our goal? What goal? Is it liberty? Our cause? What cause? Is it democracy? I won’t even go into the new “coalition,” which is a shadow of the coalition President Bush assembled to liberate Iraq. Saying you have a cause isn’t having a cause. You have to describe it in words. And if you’re going to risk American lives for it, the words had better be clear.
How about an occasional celebration of freedom by this president? How about reminding dictators of the crime they are committing every day when they deny a people’s liberty? How about educating the skeptics and brainwashed in enslaved nations about freedom’s protective, creative and curative powers?
They may be “only words,” but the principles of freedom are defended first by words. And every American president, by his words first, should be a champion of freedom.
Frank Warner
* * *
See also: Diogenes in the White House: The freedom a cynic can’t grasp.
Recent Comments