Judge Sonia Sotomayor probably would take back at least part of her suggestion in 2001 that a Latina woman’s judgment could be superior to a white man’s, President Obama said yesterday.
What Sotomayor said, among other things, eight years ago, was this:
“I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.”
‘Nine white males.’ Obama told NBC’s Brian Williams yesterday that Sotomayor probably didn’t intend the statement to be a claim to Latino supremacy, as many conservatives are arguing it is.
“I’m sure she would have restated it,” Obama said. “But if you look in the entire sweep of the essay that she wrote, what’s
clear is that she was simply saying that her life experiences will give
her information about the struggles and hardships that people are going
through.
“You know, she was pointing out, in that same essay, that it was nine white males who passed down Brown versus Board of Education, which is probably responsible for me sitting here. So that’s hardly the kind of statement that would indicate that she subscribes to identity politics.”
‘I would hope.’ The president makes a good point. Sotomayor’s statement was not a declaration of superiority. She did include the clause “I would hope,” which means she was not claming the Latina edge as a fact, but as an aspiration.
She was saying, in effect, I hope I’m better than the white men who have traditionally been our judges. If she didn’t hope that, if she didn’t believe that was possible, she’d have to disqualify herself from serving.
If you want to continue splitting hairs, note then that she was comparing a “wise Latina woman” with a white man. She wasn’t saying all Latinas are wise, but that she hopes those Latinas who are wise would be better than plain white guys.
The new unacceptable. Debates about race and ethnic groups are always in sensitive territory. Like many people, I believe there is only one race, the human race, so I wince when people look at themselves as part of a “race” smaller than the human family.
But Sotomayor also seems to have been caught up by a new social phenomenon. For decades, it has been assumed that, in America, it is impossible for any minority to be racist because a racist must be part of the dominant ethnic group in power. That assumption is changing.
As black people and Hispanics reach high positions of power, and as white people themselves become a minority group, words that minorities used without objection in the last half of the 20th century suddenly are becoming unacceptable.
A side effect. What previously was shrugged off as minority pride in ethnicity or ancestry now can be interpreted as laying the foundation for official discrimination. This is a relatively tiny side effect of decades of progress in human relations, but it should not be overlooked.
Still, we all have to be more flexible about how others celebrate their heritage. I’m half Irish-American and often proud of that. But if I say at a party of the Ancient Order of Hibernians, “The Irish are the best!” should I be disqualified forever from serving on the Supreme Court?
I think we all can cool it on this. I don’t mind that Sotomayor is proud of herself, and I don’t think her pride will hurt the court or the country.
Frank Warner
Recent Comments